October 20, 2019

Head to Head: Part five of #RWCO2

BY JOHN LANG 

We’re down to the business end of the tournament. Which nations are good and which are not so good, in climate terms.

This is the final of the five-part series, including all the playoff games — the quarters, semis and the final.

In time, I hope to write a wrap up, where I’ll discuss the reasons that, for example, the fusion-powereed French have much lower per capita emissions than the coal-fired, petrol-headed Australians.

1. Head to Head: Part one of #RWCO2

2. Head to Head: Part two of #RWCO2

3. Head to Head: Part three of #RWCO2

4. Head to Head: Part four of #RWCO2

England v Australia - per capita emissions

 

 

New Zeland v Ireland - per capita emissions

 

 

Wales v France - per capita emissions

 

 

Japan v South Africa - per capita emissions

 

 

New Zealand v England - per capita emissions

 

 

Wales v South Africa - per capita emissions

 

 

TBC — Third and fourth playoff

 

 

TBC — Final

 

 

If you’d like to see this series live, keep tabs on it via the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit’s Twitter feed: @ECIU_UK (or mine, @johnlangab)

Gutted for the ABs, but England absolutely cleaned us up.