October 20, 2019

Head to Head: Part Four of #RWCO2

BY JOHN LANG 

Which nations are good, and which are not so good. In climate terms.

This is part four of a five-part series — 10 Rugby World Cup games a pop. The next, and last, set of graphics will come out on the eve of the final. Call me biased — I’ve already inserted the All Blacks in as one of the finalists. 

If I can nab the time, I’ll write a wrap up, in which I’ll discuss the reasons that, for example, France has much lower per capita emissions than Australia, or even their bitter rivals, England. 

1. Head to Head: Part one of #RWCO2

2. Head to Head: Part two of #RWCO2

3. Head to Head: Part three of #RWCO2

Scotland vs Russia - per capita emissions

 

 

Wales v Fiji - per capita emissions 

 

Australia v Georgia - per capita emissions

 

 

New Zealand v Italy - per capita emissions

 

 

England v France - per capita emissions

 

 

Ireland v Samoa - per capita emissions

 

 

Canada v Namibia - per capita emissions

 

 

USA v Tonga - per capita emissions

 

 

Wales v Uruguay - per capita emissions

 

 

Japan v Scotland - per capita emissions

If you’d like to see this series live, keep tabs on it via the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit’s Twitter feed: @ECIU_UK (or mine, @johnlangab)

Up the ABs.